|
|
 The Animal News
News
|
|
|
TOP
By Ellin Iselin
Feature Special
to The Animal Channel
"Ah, wah, wah, wah, wah," called Dr. Jane
Goodall to her audience. The chimpanzee researcher spoke to a
capacity crowd of 5,000 people at the University of North Florida
(Jacksonville) on Feb. 29, 2000. While the social scientist already
commanded the full attention of her listeners, her imitation of a
chimp calling to others far away was nontheless a superb device. Dr. Goodall gained worldwide fame for her work
at the Gombe Stream Research Center in Africa; which she established
in 1965. But Goodall's interest in African wildlife began well
before that. The researcher credits her mother with
nuturing her love of animals and of learning. Goodall tells the
story of how she took a handful of worms to bed with her as a child.
Instead of scolding the youngster, her mother bought little Jane
books about animals. Among Goodall's childhood favorites and
inspirations was Dr. Doolittle.
In 1960, Goodall ventured to Lake Tangayika in
Africa. It was there she met Dr. Louis Leaky, renowned
anthropologist. Leaky was looking for links between chimpanzees and
early humans. The scientist recommended Goodall as a field
assistant, but enough people frowned upon a young woman venturing
into the rain forest that it became apparent that young Jane would
have to be chaperoned. Again Goodall's mother helped her daughter by
accepting the job of chaperone.
From Goodall's research have come remarkable
insights into the lives of our animal relatives. For instance, her
observations show the hierarchal structure of chimpanzee social
life. Males dominate and females develop their own separate
subculture. Does this mean males should dominate in humans? Goodall
very clearly makes a distinction between humans and chimpanzees and
we are undeniably held in higher standards. Goodall contrasts the
chimps' basic use of simple tools with the human capacity to use
high technology.
"We've traveled to the moon,"Goodall
illustrates. Likewise the scientist demonstrates the importance of
empowering women. By doing so, the entire ecosystem benefits,
Goodall opines.
"Family size drops," she states. And fewer
humans, Goodall reasons, means less destruction on the environment,
where the loss of wilderness is resulting in species reduction.
"Clearcutting is a
problem," Goodall maintains. "It's creating a desert for our kids
and grandkids." And, she explains, this leads not only to a loss of
individuals, but to a loss in the quality of populations and their
genetic diversity. "This applies to animals where all the human
populations are growing," Goodall says.
Human havoc can be seen in the drop of
chimpanzees -- now numbering between 120,000 and 150,000 down from 2
million several decades ago. Goodall says the decrease can be
attributed to loss of habitat and hunters who, according to Goodall,
show no mercy.
"Chimps, elephants, antelope -- everything that
moves, they shoot," she says.
During her presentation, Goodall showed slides
of a baby chimp, who'd been "adopted" by a dog. They mother had been
killed by humters and the dog became a mother substitute of sorts
for the baby, Goodall explained. Other orphans have ended up being
trained for advertising and film.
"We know they're abused," the researcher stated,
adding that consumers who buy purchase products made from these wild
animals contribute to the problem by creating a market. But she
remains optimistic about human nature.
"Everyone of us makes a difference," she said.
"Don't let anybody laugh you out of your dreams."
The Jane Goodall Institute
Books by Jane Goodall
|
TOP
Cows on Parade
Cows in downtown Chicago?

|
Legend has
it that Mrs. O'Leary's cow knocked over a lantern and started
the Great Chicago Fire.
From June through November 1999, the City
of Chicago hosted whimsical bovines
with Cows on Parade. Take a Tour of the Windy City with these
colorful cattle!
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
by Barbara Bidell, News Director
The killing of a six-year-old tiger in Loxahatchee, Florida in July has raised questions about the dangers of keeping large animals in captivity. It was in July that Bobo, a tiger belonging to Tarzan actor Steve Sipek, was shot and killed in Florida after he escaped from the actor’s five acre compound. Sipek told CBS’ "The Early Show" that Bobo was "let out by somebody who is interested in causing problems." Sipek called the shooting "murder" and said that the animal was not ferocious, but "helpless". Authorities reportedly killed the tiger after it lunged at workers who were trying to recapture it.
The incident brings attention to what one sanctuary founder calls a growing problem in the United States: a growing number of big cats in captivity.
"There are 15,000 big cats in captivity in the U-S," says animal behaviorist Jonathan Kraft, who runs Keepers of the Wild, a no-kill, no-breed sanctuary outside Kingman, Arizona. "Only ten percent of those big cats are with zoos and sanctuaries." Kraft says the rest are owned by individuals, many of whom do not have a license to have the cats. Kraft says there is a high demand for the cats when they’re young, and breeders are meeting demand Kraft says breeding the large cats is a 15 billion dollar business, and a very dangerous business at that.
"You cannot domesticate tigers," he told The Animal Channel in a phone interview. "They’re cute when they’re little, but when they get older they become a burden."
Kraft says he currently has 200 such animals on a waiting list to get into his sanctuary. He’s at capacity at 130. He says most people who buy these tigers do not know what they are getting into. Kraft finds the circumstances surrounding Bobo’s escape and death unnerving.
"He should not have had a single gate on that property that could be opened," Kraft said of Sipek’s comment that someone had opened the gate. Kraft says the tiger should have had a perimeter fence as well. He also says the authorities could have better handled the situation.
"I doubt if the cat lunged at the officer, but I do believe they were afraid of it." Kraft says however, the authorities options were limited. He says most of the time tranquilizing a large cat in not an option.
"It can take 20 minutes for a cat to go down," he says. "In the meantime, you have a ticked off cat with a dart in its butt."
Kraft says those who take on the responsibility of keeping wild and exotic animals have got to take the responsibility seriously. Kraft has between 30 and 40 volunteers and twelve full time employees at Keepers of the Wild, six of them are "handlers", those who are trained to go into the cages. But they have to take precautions.
"I do not allow anyone in the cages without a back up," he says. "They (the handlers) serve as the eyes you should have in the back of your head."
The handlers are also aided by a three by six foot race used to separate the human handlers from the animal. Kraft cautions those who are thinking about entering the large animal trade from a buyer’s standpoint. He says not only is it dangerous to have a large cat on your property, it is expensive. He says it costs 15 dollars a day just to feed a tiger. He says if the cat has medical problems, the $450.00 a month could be just a drop in the bucket. Meanwhile, the demand has prompted Kraft to beef his capacity. Keepers of the Wild is in the middle of an eight million dollar expansion to try to keep up with what he sees as an insatiable demand.
"It’s over the top, insanity," he says.
For more information about Keepers of the Wild visit www.keepersofthewild.org
National Veterinary Medical Services Act
by Barbara Bidell, News Director
Listen to National Veterinary Medical Services Act
|
A Trace of Mold
by Barbara Bidell, News Director
(Las Vegas, NV) -- Anyone with a dog knows how useful their best friend can be. Canines
provide unconditional love, protection, help law enforcement officers nail criminals, lead
the visually impaired, and improve the quality of life for hospitalized patients. You can add
one more achievement to species’ list of successes -- dogs can be trained to detect mold.
I recently met with Erik Lundgaard founder and CEO of Mold Sniffers, whose Jack
Russell Terrier, Trace, is one of a group of 20 dogs across the country that are certified to
detect mold. Although, it is a fairly recent phenomenon in the United States, dogs have
been dutifully detecting mold in Europe for years. The practice originated in Sweden,
where dogs were used to detect wood-destroying fungi that were feared to be looming in
houses. And in Germany government authorities have found it more practical and less time
consuming for a dog to detect mold than for a human expert. Lundgaard says he can also
make that claim for Trace.
“Trace can get to places faster than people, detect mold in places that people can’t reach
and pinpoint areas that may have been missed by other kinds of searches,” says
Lundgaard. And he says earlier detection means a less costly clean up. Traditionally,
property owners were limited to two types of inspections: visual and air testing, which
can be costly and inconclusive.
Lundgaard explains that often mold can be lurking in places that are invisible -- behind
walls, in floors or behind installations. He says many times he is called because residents or
occupants of an office building display symptoms of mold infestation -- anything from
watery eyes to fatigue and respiratory problems. Often, these symptoms are the only signs
that something is wrong.
Lundgaard says that’s where Trace comes in. The twelve pound slip of a dog spent 1,000
hours in training and can detect 18 different species of mold. In a typical inspection,
Lundgaard insists that other animals are out of the house and that there is no cooking that
might interfere with Trace’s search.
“The dog’s actually picking up the smell of gases,” he explains, so interference is kept at a
minimum.
With Trace’s daily food allowance in a portable pouch Lundgaard leads her through a
“sweep of the room” so she can “feel the environment”. If Trace finds something
suspicious she engages in what Lundgaard calls a “passive alert”, that is she sits and stares
the suspected mold site. Then she’s allowed to zero in. Lundgaard commands “show me”
and Trace leads him to the exact point of the problem. Lundgaard then marks the point,
gives Trace a kibble as a reward, and moves on. After the first sweep is completed, the
team goes around a second time to make sure Trace hits the same spots twice. Lundgaard
then takes samples of the suspected mold infested area and sends them to a lab in Oregon.
Lundgaard then prepares a report for the homeowner.
Lundgaard says Trace’s accuracy percentage tops the best of her human counterparts. Her
accuracy rate hovers around 90 percent.
Not every dog can be trained in mold detection. Like any animal trained for service, the
dog must be of a certain temperament.
“She’s (Trace) has a very good temperament for a J.R.. (Jack Russell),” he says. In fact,
when Trace is not delving into baseboards and tiles to detect mold, she’s trouncing around
the house with Lundgaard’s two other dogs.
Once a dog is determined to be up for the task, he or she needs to go through hours of
training, similar to that undergone by dogs trained to find bombs.
Trace’s journey started at the Florida Humane Society where she was adopted and trained
Bill Whitstine who runs MoldDog, a company based in the Sunshine State that has trained
19 other dogs across the country. There Trace was matched with Lundgaard and his wife
Pamela, who were also trained by Whitstine. The Lundgaard’s took Trace to Las Vegas
after investing a cool $12,500.00. However, Lundgaard has already made up the
difference. His phones rings constantly -- with homeowners, building managers, and even
new home builders requesting his services.
One would think that the Mojave Desert, which records an average of four inches of rain a
year, would be the most unlikely place for mold to grow. Not so, according to
Lundgaard: the heat outside the home coupled with the artificially induced cool inside
provides for an ideal environment for condensation in the walls of the home or building.
The building’s materials just add to the mix for mold.
“The material in the dry wall feeds the mold,” he says. “No place is immune.”
|
The De-clawing Debate
by Barbara Bidell, News Director
(Sacramento, CA) -- When the California legislature opened in December, West Hollywood Assemblyman Paul Koretz was scheduled to re-introduce a controversial measure. Assembly Bill 395 will not eliminate the state’s budget woes -- but it might end the woes of one of America’s favorite pets. Assemblyman Koretz is working to ban de-clawing in the golden state, following the lead of the West Hollywood City Council that made the practice illegal last April. He introduced the measure in the state legislature last year, but it was voted down in committee. Koretz believes that the bill was more a victim of circumstance than anything.
"It’s difficult to get a lot of legislators interested in animal issues when you have a 38 billion dollar budget shortfall," explains Koretz. Koretz says there is a lot of sympathy out there, especially when he explains the details surrounding the surgery.
"Half of the value of the bill is getting the information out there," says Koretz. "Pet owners don’t realize that it is a partial amputation."
Jennifer Conrad, a veterinarian who heads up the Santa Monica based Paw Project, agrees.
"If people were educated, they wouldn’t want to do this to their pets." Conrad says during an onychectomy, the bone is "crushed" at the first joint. Conrad says no only is it painful, but many cats suffer long term effects. She says she worked for sanctuaries where she had about 40 cats who were all suffering from de-clawing. Conrad remembers one Bobcat that suffered tremendously from a botched surgery.
"There was black puss and bone chards coming out of his feet," she remembers. She says the feline was in so much pain, it could barely walk. Conrad says this anecdote is relived in hundreds of cats. In fact, she spends much of her time surgically repairing damage done by declawing. She says most people don’t realize what they’re doing to their animals.
"They think it’s a magical manicure," she says. "It’s actually an amputation of the bone." She says even surgeries that are performed correctly still impose tremendous suffering that amounts to animal cruelty. Conrad points out that the practice is already banned in many countries. In United Kingdom, de-clawing falls under the animal cruelty laws. However, Dr. Leslie Cooper, a veterinarian who specializes in animal behavior, says its hard to compare the treatment of domestic animals in the United States and Europe. She says in the U.K. for example, pet owners are strongly discouraged from keeping their cats inside all the time. In fact, she knows of one shelter that refused to allow a cat to go home with an owner who was not able to let the cat out.
The chief opponent of the ban has been California Veterinary Medical Association. CVMA Executive Director Dick Schumacher says the problems associated with de-clawing have only been documented consistently in large cats. He says, furthermore, if de-clawing is banned, more domestic cats will be abandoned.
"A lot more cats would be euthanized," he predicts. He says some cat owners who have weakened immune systems must have their cats de-clawed for health reasons.
But Conrad says de-clawed cats develop other behavior problems. She says some resort to biting and others have a hard time using the litter box. In fact, Conrad says that many pet owners abandon their cats after de-clawing because of these changes in behavior.
However, Dr. Cooper says these changes in behavior have not been substantiated. A recent article in the Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association seems to support Dr. Cooper’s skepticism. In that article, Dr. Gary Patronek, cites six studies on de-clawing, but comes to no solid conclusion: "The most that can be said about adverse behavioral sequelae to the onychectomy is that they remain as hard to dismiss as they are to quantify." Dr. Cooper agrees: "There simply needs to be more study," she says.
In the meantime, what is a pet owner to do? All involved seem to agree on one thing: pet owners should do their own research before they make a decision. Conrad emphasizes there are plenty of alternatives out there. She says it might just be a matter of getting the right scratching pad, or simply covering the cats slaws with any of the various products that are on the market. She hopes that pet owners will spare their cats the surgery in hopes that she might avoid adding another heart-wrenching anecdote to her chronicle.
| |